it was interesting to participate in the handicap despite such great odds Champions beat me to it I think if there were more rounds (as in the Saturday tournament), and someone else walked and Saturday turbo tournament laich up plan handicap?
Polub 2 9
_gst6907763
2019-11-13 15:39
2
but no, all I remembered - in the Cup thought you wrote no handicap but sorry, I'd have looked how the handicap works on a large number of rounds
Memo
2019-11-13 16:07
4
Работать будет точно так же. Пропорция сохраняется. Коэффициент увеличения форы зависит от числа туров (делится на два с округлением вниз). При нечетном количестве туров лидерам чуть полегче (из-за округления).
В теории можно было бы поднять коэффициент форы вообще ровно до количества туров, т.е. сделать +5 для каждого последующего игрока. Тогда бы фора полностью уравнивала шансы, при условии, что все играют ровно в свой рейтинг. В этом случае по итогам турнира у всех было бы одинаковое количество очков. Но, думаю, это бы точно не понравилось лидерам, поэтому я выбрал более лайтовый вариант. А предложения сделать +1, т.е. 20% от количество туров, практически бы не оказывает влияния на ситуацию, такой гандикап лишен смысла.
_gst6907763
2019-11-13 16:26
1
clear realized that the handicap+2 is designed for 5-6 rounds, and the Sabbath 17 rounds, that is step handicap would be +8 Yes, it's tough such a head start to outrun, but still curious as to how in practice it would be
Memo
2019-11-13 16:59
3
6 is a +3.
If the last turbo event https://en.grandgames.net/tournaments/1809 was with the handicap (step +8), then you would with a margin of just one point would have won (147) Artail would take second with 146 points. And the third would split @mvt222 and @Game with 144 points.
i.e., everyone would be very tight.
olenenok
2019-11-13 17:03
3
@Memo I admire in such a deep study of this question with handicaps and formulas.
Memo
2019-11-13 17:22
3
thank you, worked through the many options, the current has the perfect balance, in my opinion, to keep the interest. the perfect system but of course there can't be, due to the fact that the rating can vary somewhat by chance (unable to finish the tournament, distracting,or Vice-versa, the player could in theory use third-party software and to play better than they actually are). The novice or the player who has played few tournaments and rating is still not well established, can play a much worse/better than the default rating.
_gst6907763
2019-11-13 17:23
3
ahaha, I would have jumped from seventh to first place and all moved! - it's funny
"If the last turbo event https://en.grandgames.net/tournaments/1809 was with the handicap (step +8), then you would with a margin of just one point would have won (147), thanks to the handicap of 56 points. Artail would take second with 146 points. And the third would split @mvt222 and @Game with 144 points."
however after this the rating would be up and not see me any more so fancy the odds @Memo, thanks, I feel like I have been there
Memo
2019-11-13 17:34
3
Thrown off, because I would have played much stronger rating, which you were then (nearly the lowest in the tournament).
Memo
2019-11-13 17:35
3
The rating would go up exactly the same. It reflects the real level of the game, provided a sufficient number of statistics games, despite the odds.
Jeśli znajdziesz niedokładne lub błędne tłumaczenie elementów interfejsu witryny, zgłoś: @GrandGames